Friday, October 28, 2005

Smoking Helps Protect Against Lung Cancer

http://www.vialls.com/transpositions/smoking.html

Copyright Joe Vialls. 16 July 2003

Every year, thousands of medical doctors and other members of the “Anti-Smoking Inquisition” spend billions of dollars perpetuating what has unquestionably become the most misleading though successful social engineering scam in history. With the encouragement of most western governments, these Orwellian lobbyists pursue smokers with a fanatical zeal that completely overshadows the ridiculous American alcohol prohibition debacle, which started in 1919 and lasted until 1933.

Nowadays we look back on American prohibition with justifiable astonishment. Is it really true that an entire nation allowed itself to be denied a beer or scotch by a tiny group of tambourine-bashing fanatics? Sadly, yes it is, despite a total lack of evidence that alcohol causes any harm to humans, unless consumed in truly astronomical quantities.

Alas, the safety of alcohol was of no interest to the tambourine-bashers, for whom control over others was the one and only true goal. Americans were visibly “sinning” by enjoying themselves having a few alcoholic drinks, and the puritans interceded on behalf of God to make them all feel miserable again.

Although there is no direct link between alcohol and tobacco, the history of American prohibition is important, because it helps us understand how a tiny number of zealots managed to control the behavior and lives of tens of millions of people. Nowadays exactly the same thing is happening to smokers, though this time it is at the hands of government zealots and ignorant medical practitioners rather than tambourine-bashing religious fanatics.

Certain governments know that their past actions are directly responsible for causing most of the lung and skin cancers in the world today, so they go to extreme lengths in trying to deflect responsibility and thus financial liability away from themselves, and onto harmless organic tobacco instead. As we will find later in the report, humble organic tobacco has never hurt anyone, and in certain ways can justifiably claim to provide startling health protection.

Not all governments around the world share the same problem. Japan and Greece have the highest numbers of adult cigarette smokers in the world, but the lowest incidence of lung cancer. In direct contrast to this, America, Australia, Russia, and some South Pacific island groups have the lowest numbers of adult cigarette smokers in the world, but the highest incidence of lung cancer. This is clue number-one in unraveling the absurd but entrenched western medical lie that “smoking causes lung cancer.”

The first European contact with tobacco was in 1492, when Columbus and fellow explorer Rodriguo de Jerez saw natives smoking in Cuba. That very same day, de Jerez took his first puff and found it very relaxing, just as the locals had assured him it would be. This was an important occasion, because Rodriguo de Jerez discovered what the Cubans and native Americans had known for many centuries: that cigar and cigarette smoking is not only relaxing, it also cures coughs and other minor ailments. When he returned home, Rodriguo de Jerez proudly lit a cigar in the street, and was promptly arrested and imprisoned for three years by the horrified Spanish Inquisition. De Jerez thus became the first victim of the anti-smoking lobbies.

In less than a century, smoking became a much enjoyed and accepted social habit throughout Europe, with thousands of tons of tobacco being imported from the colonies to meet the increasing demand. A growing number of writers praised tobacco as a universal remedy for mankind’s ills. By the early 20th Century almost one in every two people smoked, but the incidence of lung cancer remained so low that it was almost immeasurable. Then something extraordinary happened on July 16, 1945: a terrifying cataclysmic event that would eventually cause western governments to distort the perception of smoking forever. As K. Greisen recalls:

“When the intensity of the light had diminished, I put away the glass and looked toward the tower directly. At about this time I noticed a blue color surrounding the smoke cloud. Then someone shouted that we should observe the shock wave travelling along the ground. The appearance of this was a brightly lighted circular area, near the ground, slowly spreading out towards us. The color was yellow.

“The permanence of the smoke cloud was one thing that surprised me. After the first rapid explosion, the lower part of the cloud seemed to assume a fixed shape and to remain hanging motionless in the air. The upper part meanwhile continued to rise, so that after a few minutes it was at least five miles high. It slowly assumed a zigzag shape because of the changing wind velocity at different altitudes. The smoke had pierced a cloud early in its ascent, and seemed to be completely unaffected by the cloud.”


This was the notorious “Trinity Test”, the first dirty nuclear weapon to be detonated in the atmosphere. A six-kilogram sphere of plutonium, compressed to supercriticality by explosive lenses, Trinity exploded over New Mexico with a force equal to approximately 20,000 tons of TNT. Within seconds, billions of deadly radioactive particles were sucked into the atmosphere to an altitude of six miles, where high-speed jet streams could circulate them far and wide.

The American Government knew about the radiation in advance, was well aware of its lethal effects on humans, but bluntly ordered the test with a complete disregard for health and welfare. In law, this was culpable gross negligence, but the American Government did not care. Sooner or later, one way or the other, they would find another culprit for any long-term effects suffered by Americans and other citizens in local and more remote areas.

If a single microscopic radioactive fallout particle lands on your skin at the beach, you get skin cancer. Inhale a single particle of the same lethal muck, and death from lung cancer becomes inevitable, unless you happen to be an exceptionally lucky cigarette smoker. The solid microscopic radioactive particle buries itself deep in the lung tissue, completely overwhelms the body’s limited reserves of vitamin B17, and causes rampant uncontrollable cell multiplication.

How can we be absolutely sure that radioactive fallout particles really cause lung cancer every time a subject is internally exposed? For real scientists, as opposed to medical quacks and government propagandists, this is not a problem. For any theory to be accepted scientifically, it must first be proven in accordance with rigorous requirements universally agreed by scientists. First the suspect radioactive agent must be isolated, then used in properly controlled laboratory experiments to produce the claimed result, i.e. lung cancer in mammals.

Scientists have ruthlessly sacrificed tens of thousands of mice and rats in this way over the years, deliberately subjecting their lungs to radioactive matter. The documented scientific results of these various experiments are identical. Every mouse or rat obediently contracts lung cancer, and every mouse or rat then dies. Theory has thus been converted to hard scientific fact under tightly controlled laboratory conditions. The suspect agent [radioactive matter] caused the claimed result [lung cancer] when inhaled by mammals.

The overall magnitude of lung cancer risk to humans from atmospheric radioactive fallout cannot be overstated. Before Russia, Britain and America outlawed atmospheric testing on August 5, 1963, more than 4,200 kilograms of plutonium had been discharged into the atmosphere. Because we know that less than one microgram [millionth of a single gram] of inhaled plutonium causes terminal lung cancer in a human, we therefore know that your friendly government has lofted 4,200,000,000 [4.2 Billion] lethal doses into the atmosphere, with particle radioactive half-life a minimum of 50,000 years. Frightening? Unfortunately it gets worse.

The plutonium mentioned above exists in the actual nuclear weapon before detonation, but by far the greatest number of deadly radioactive particles are those derived from common dirt or sand sucked up from the ground, and irradiated while travelling vertically through the weapon’s fireball. These particles form by far the largest part of the “smoke” in any photo of an atmospheric nuclear detonation. In most cases several tons of material are sucked up and permanently irradiated in transit, but let us be incredibly conservative and claim that only 1,000 kilograms of surface material is sucked up by each individual atmospheric nuclear test.

Before being banned by Russia, Britain and America, a total of 711 atmospheric nuclear tests were conducted, thereby creating 711,000 kilograms of deadly microscopic radioactive particles, to which must be added the original 4,200 kilograms from the weapons themselves, for a gross though very conservative total of 715,200 kilograms. There are more than a million lethal doses per kilogram, meaning that your governments have contaminated your atmosphere with more than 715,000,000,000 [715 Billion] such doses, enough to cause lung or skin cancer 117 times in every man, woman and child on earth.

Before you ask, no, the radioactive particles do not just “fade away”, at least not in your lifetime or that of your children and grandchildren. With a half-life of 50,000 years or longer, these countless trillions of deadly government-manufactured radioactive particles are essentially with you forever. Circulated around the world by powerful jet streams, these particles are deposited at random, though in higher concentrations within a couple of thousand miles of the original test sites. A simple wind or other surface disturbance is all that is needed to stir them up again and create enhanced dangers for those in the vicinity.

The once-innocent activity of playfully kicking sand around on the beach in summer could nowadays easily translate to suicide, if you happen to stir up a few radioactive particles that could stick to your skin or be inhaled into your lungs. Stop poking fun at Michael Jackson when he appears at your local airport wearing a surgical mask over his nose and mouth. He may look eccentric, but Michael will almost certainly outlive most of us.

Twelve years after the cataclysmic Trinity test, it became obvious to western governments that things were getting completely out of control, with a 1957 British Medical Research Council report stating that global “deaths from lung cancer have more than doubled during the period 1945 to 1955”, though no explanation was offered. During the same ten-year period, cancer deaths in the immediate proximity of Hiroshima and Nagasaki went up threefold. By the end of official atmospheric testing in 1963, the incidence of lung cancer in the Pacific Islands had increased fivefold since 1945. Having screwed your environment completely for 50,000 years, it was time for “big government” to start taking heavy diversionary action.

How could people be proved to be causing themselves to contract lung cancer, i.e. be said to be guilty of a self inflicted injury for which government could never be blamed or sued? The only obvious substance that people inhaled into their lungs, apart from air, was tobacco smoke, so the government boot was put in. Poorly qualified medical “researchers” suddenly found themselves overwhelmed with massive government grants all aimed at achieving the same end-result: “Prove that smoking causes lung cancer”. Real scientists [especially some notable nuclear physicists] smiled grimly at the early pathetic efforts of the fledgling anti-smoking lobby, and lured them into the deadliest trap of all. The quasi medical researchers were invited to prove their false claims under exactly the same rigid scientific rules that were used when proving that radioactive particles cause lung cancer in mammals.

Remember, for any theory to be accepted scientifically, it must first be proven in accordance with rigorous requirements universally agreed by scientists. First the suspect agent [tobacco smoke] must be isolated, then used in properly controlled laboratory experiments to produce the claimed result, i.e. lung cancer in mammals. Despite exposing literally tens of thousands of especially vulnerable mice and rats to the equivalent of 200 cigarettes per day for years on end, “medical science” has never once managed to induce lung cancer in any mouse or rat. Yes, you did read that correctly. For more than forty years, hundreds of thousands of medical doctors have been deliberately lying to you.

The real scientists had the quasi medical researchers by the throat, because “pairing” the deadly radioactive particle experiment with the benign tobacco smoke experiment, proved conclusively for all time that smoking cannot under any circumstances cause lung cancer. And further, in one large “accidental” experiment they were never allowed to publish, the real scientists proved with startling clarity that smoking actually helps to protect against lung cancer.

All mice and rats are used one-time-only in a specific experiment, and then destroyed. In this way researchers ensure that the results of whatever substance they are testing cannot be accidentally “contaminated” by the real or imagined effects of another substance. Then one day as if by magic, a few thousand mice from the smoking experiment “accidentally” found their way into the radioactive particle experiment, which in the past had killed every single one of its unfortunate test subjects. But this time, completely against the odds, sixty percent of the smoking mice survived exposure to the radioactive particles. The only variable was their prior exposure to copious quantities of tobacco smoke.

Government pressure was immediately brought to bear and the facts suppressed, but this did not completely silence the real scientists. Tongue in cheek perhaps, Professor Schrauzer, President of the International Association of Bio-inorganic Chemists, testified before a U.S. congressional committee in 1982 that it had long been well known to scientists that certain constituents of tobacco smoke act as anti-carcinogens [anti-cancer agents] in test animals. He continued that when known carcinogens [cancer causing substances] are applied to the animals, the application of constituents of cigarette smoke counter them.

Nor did Professor Schrauzer stop there. He further testified on oath to the committee that “no ingredient of cigarette smoke has been shown to cause human lung cancer”, adding that “no-one has been able to produce lung cancer in laboratory animals from smoking.” It was a neat answer to a rather perplexing problem. If government blocks publication of your scientific paper, take the alternate route and put the essential facts on the written congressional record!

Predictably, this hard truth drove the government and quasi medical “researchers” into a frenzy of rage. By 1982 they had actually started to believe their own ridiculous propaganda, and were not to be silenced by eminent members of the scientific establishment. Quite suddenly they switched the blame to other “secret” ingredients put into cigarettes by the tobacco companies. “Yes, that must be it!” they clamored eagerly, until a handful of scientists got on the phone and pointed out that these same “secret” ingredients had been included in the mice experiments, and had therefore also been proved incapable of causing lung cancer.

Things were looking desperate for government and the medical community overall. Since the anti-smoking funding had started in the early sixties, tens of thousands of medical doctors had passed through medical school, where they had been taught that smoking causes lung cancer. Most believed the lie, but cracks were starting to appear in the paintwork. Even the dullest of straight “C” doctors could not really make the data correlate, and when they queried it were told not to ask stupid questions. “Smoking causes lung cancer” converted to a creed, a quasi religious belief mechanism where blind faith became a substitute for proof.


Even blind faith needs a system of positive reinforcement, which in this case became the advertising agencies and the media. Suddenly the television screens were flooded with images of terribly blackened “smoker’s lungs”, with the accompanying mantra that you will die in horrible agony if you don’t quit now. It was all pathetic rubbish of course. On the mortuary slab the lungs of a smoker and non-smoker look an identical pink, and the only way a forensic pathologist can tell you might have been a smoker, is if he finds heavy stains of nicotine on your fingers, a packet of Camels or Marlboro in your coat pocket, or if one of your relatives unwisely admits on the record that you once smoked the demon weed.

The black lungs? From a coal miner, who throughout his working life breathed in copious quantities of microscopic black coal dust particles. Just like radioactive particles they get caught deep in the tissue of the lungs and stay there forever. If you worked down the coal mines for twenty or more years without a face mask, your lungs will probably look like this on the slab.

Many people ask exactly how it is that those smoking mice were protected from deadly radioactive particles, and even more are asking why real figures nowadays are showing far more non-smokers dying from lung cancer than smokers. Professor Sterling of the Simon Fraser University in Canada is perhaps closest to the truth, where he uses research papers to reason that smoking promotes the formation of a thin mucous layer in the lungs, “which forms a protective layer stopping any cancer-carrying particles from entering the lung tissue.”

This is probably as close as we can get to the truth at present, and it does make perfect scientific sense. Deadly radioactive particles inhaled by a smoker would initially be trapped by the mucous layer, and then be ejected from the body before they could enter the tissue.

All of this may be a bit depressing for non-smokers, but there are probably one or two things you can do to minimize the risks as far as possible. Rather than shy away from smokers in your local pub or club, get as close as you can and breathe in their expensive second-hand smoke. Go on, don’t be shy, suck in a few giant breaths. Or perhaps you could smoke one cigarette or small cigar after each meal, just three a day to build up a thin boundary mucous layer. If you cannot or will not do either of the above, consider phoning Michael Jackson to ask for a spare surgical mask!

8 Comments:

Blogger Middle Child said...

O am aware of Joe Vialiss? He wrote abot the corruption re artin Bryant and the Port Arthur cover up(Australia) I believe he died recently...will try to fins out mor ok. He was a true freedom fighter.
If you want to get rid of the spammers posting consider turning on your "word verification" in your system..they really are a pain as yopu would know.

4/01/2006 6:12 AM  
Blogger Middle Child said...

My spelling and typing is terrible I realise "artin bryant is meant to be " Martin bryant" and hope you can figure out the rest of my bad typing ok.

4/01/2006 6:14 AM  
Blogger Truthseeker444 said...

Very interesting report. Lately I have been looking into the possibility that smoking is good for you. They have been banging it home to us for so long that it kills you, that it is hard to break free of that kind of indoctrination.

11/02/2010 4:04 PM  
Blogger Truthseeker444 said...

At the minute I am doing a cancer care course, and I have uncovered many very alarming facts about the cancer industry. The pharmas make 200 BILLION dollars a years from cancer, and this many decades they have actively suppress natural cures, and things such as vitamin B 17, which is essential for the treatment and prevention of cancer.
The Northern Ireland cancer prevention unit spends 1/3 of its budget telling people to eat more fruit and veg. They do specify that it should be organic, and not laden with chemical fertilizers and pesticides. In other words they are encouraging people to eat food that will weaken their immune system and give them cancer!

11/02/2010 4:05 PM  
Blogger Truthseeker444 said...

1/3 of their budget also goes towards telling people how dangerous the Sun is!!!!!!
That would be the same sun that gives us vitamin D strengthens our immune system, and helps us fight cancer! They also tell people they must wear sun screen at all times to protect themselves. My investigations into sun creams, is that they actually cause cancer.
They are laden with a chemical cocktail which includes nano particles which go straight into the bloodstream. the other more dangerous chemicals can ride on the back of these particles, and also end up directly in the blood stream.
The remaining third of their budget goes towards telling people how dangerous smoking is! So far I had to reverse everything they said to get the truth, so by the same reverse thinking, I have been wondering does smoking actually protect you from cancer!
According to Cancer research UK most people who die of lung cancer are smokers, but I have found a lot of misinformation on their web site, so I would question their findings.In my 49 years I have only ever known one person who smoked who died of lung cancer. And she was addicted to fly spray, you could not go into her house without choking on it, and when she took lung cancer everyone who knew her blamed the fly spray.
The placebo effect also has to be taken into account, what you think aboit you bring about, and smokers are so brainwashed into believing they are going to take lung cancer, that they could be bringing it on themselves!
I am not given to quoting the bible, but there is a passage which says something about "there will come a time when lies will become truth, and what has been presented as truth will be shown to be lies". I think we have reached that time.
well done, and excellent article, I will be re-posting on various sites.
Sandra barr

11/02/2010 4:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A misty morning does not signify a cloudy day.

4/28/2011 5:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do you understand that smoking cause /not cancer just because you sad so (?). Well we can compare statistically case of lung cancer among smokers and nonsmokers. You don’t need run clinical trails for that.
Toxins ore anything from changed environment make faille of the stem cells to differentiate to new replacement cells. It is mutation of cell exposed for something. If it is beneficial mutation, we cal it process of evolution. If it is not, beneficial mutation, we cal it distinction, process of natural selection. Cancer is one of non beneficial mutations. Group of same kind of successful differentiated stem cells is healthy organ. Mucus in the lung is quite fast renewable which means quite sensitive for environmental changes ore expose, something what usually not there.
Cancer develops in 20 – 30 years as result of expose. Fastest form of cancer known developed in 7 years (Hiroshima Nagasaki children exposed for radiation).
Cure is stopping all toxic expose: old feelings in teeth (mercury poison), non modern coming diet and cannabis indicia hash oil. That is criminal illegal. Ore after you faille traditional treatment and be qualified for clinical trails, $100 000/ per year, insurance don’t cover as experimental treatment not approved by FDA. Stanislaw Burzynski MD, PhD method which is Antineoplaston (ANP) is a name coined by Stanislaw Burzynski for a group of peptides, derivatives, and mixtures that he uses as an alternative cancer treatment. Success 30%.

Sylvester

9/22/2011 8:36 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting. I'll have to look into this more.

12/29/2011 4:34 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, September 27, 2005

No Rita here

It rained pretty steady yesterday and while I was told it was the effects of Hurricane Rita, the mild comforting feeling told me differently.

So when I talked to Steve Baron I was compelled to ask him - "What did you do yesterday?"

He laughed and explained it was the first time he was able to get out in his boat this summer due to technical difficulties. Being late in the season, he figured it just might be his last chance for the year as well. Despite engine trouble, he and Lisa managed to thoroughly gift Lake Ontario with plenty of gifts, particularly around Cherry Beach and Center Island. He found a HAARP array with 11 towers on the island.

The result is typical -- steady cleansing rain followed by clear blue skies. The cycle will continue for a few days, quite possibly weeks as we saw when he released the mega cb last fall.

Nice job! =]

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, September 11, 2005

Katrina: Natural Disaster or Planned Event

Fooling with Mother Nature: The Bush-Clinton Katrina Fund
www.bushclintonkatrinafund.org

by Carol Adler, with Presidential Candidate John Joseph Kennedy (JJK)

Yesterday I received a phone call from my friend, John Joseph Kennedy, who as many may recall, was a 2004 True Democrat Presidential Write-In Candidate. After expressing our mutual grief and despair about Katrina, JJK plunged into the real reason for his call.

"Carol, did you know Katrina was not a 'natural disaster' after all, as President Bush keeps repeating to the people in his press conferences?"

"I've been hearing stories," I told John, "and of course, Dandelion (my publishing company) has published books that include information about environmental warfare and weather modification techniques."

I also knew about the work of Dr. Bernard Eastlund who, while working as a consultant for Advance Power Technologies, Inc. (APTI) in the 1980s, patented devices that are described as capable of "causing” total disruption of communications over a very large portion of the earth, missile or aircraft destruction, deflection or confusion, weather modification." (Angels Don't Play this HAARP, by Nick Begich & Jeane Manning, 1995, Earthpulse Press, www.earthpulse.com ).

In my archives is an article by Scott Gilbert, an environmental engineering student, written for The Ontarian at Guelph University and posted on www.globalresearch.ca January 2004:

"These patents were based on the ideas and fundamental research of Nicola Tesla (many of his ideas were stolen by US corporations). Some of Eastlund's patents were temporarily sealed under a US Secrecy Order. APTI and Eastlund's patents were quickly purchased by E-Systems, a company that is home to many retired and currently employed CIA agents. In 1933 E-Systems received $1.8 billion in classified contracts. Raytheon, the fourth largest US defense contractor and third largest aerospace company, currently holds the patents." (Corporate Watch website - Raytheon http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/profiles/raytheon/raytheon.htm)

The following is an excerpt from one of JJK's 2004 Presidential Campaign speeches found through a Google search:

"The Bush family, Bush Sr., George W. and Florida Governor Jeb Bush are bilking the American government and victims by pocketing hundreds of millions of dollars from their on-going criminal billion-dollar 'Disaster relief' programs. Much of the money is going to them, not the victims. Wake up America!"

[During the past 20 years, JJK has been directly involved in environmental protection programs. In 1984 he created the Richter Duck Earthquake Safety Program for California and Doppler Duck Safety Programs for Tornado-Hurricane Safety. He has been an outspoken spokesman and expert on these weather conditions and safety measures to take before, during and after a disaster. He has also been a voice for the protection and preservation of the oceans and all marine life, especially the vital lives of whales and dolphins. JJK was one of the first to publicly speak out against the MOAB (Mother of All Bombs) the Bush Family has detonated throughout the oceans for oil and gas exploration, causing immeasurable death and destruction to marine and human life. The bomb(s) are also directly responsible for the Christmas 2004 tsunami that killed hundreds of thousands of people, another "UNNATURAL DISASTER". JJK has written a wonderful series of books and animated screenplays, "Royal Critters" and "Whale Magic" for children, based on his Save the Whales-Love for the Oceans Project.]

JJK's campaign speech continued: "The environmental destruction caused by the evil, manipulative man-made hurricanes (not man-made directly by the Bush family, but increased in intensity and frequency by 'Global-Warming') has not only caused death and destruction to human lives, but has also upset and destroyed the oceans, whales, marine life and the natural order of our planet.”

"I have been tracking the hurricanes this past season with keen interest. I have been privy to intelligence from the highest sources and the American Red Cross, thus confirming my suspicions; these hurricanes are all man-made by the Bush family (as a result of their industrial lobbyists and political supporters' lack of concern for the environment, and 'Global Warming') and I intend to hold the entire Bush Family Administration criminally, financially and morally responsible for the cruelest assault on humankind and our environment once I become President."

And now, back to my phone conversation with JJK:

"I want to share something with you, Carol. Go to Network Solutions,
www.networksolutions.com and look up
www.bushclintonkatrinafund.org.”

"Then type in the name of this website or domain, as if you wished to reserve or purchase it.”

"You will receive the message that it has already been taken, of course," said JJK. "Now scroll to the place where you can learn more information about the owner of this domain."

I listened carefully, not sure yet where JJK was going with these instructions, but well aware it was leading to something critically important.

"You will learn in the WHOIS Record that bushclintonkatrinafund.org was registered by the Bush-Clinton Katrina Fund, 55 W 125th Street, New York, NY 10027 US, and the record was created 02-Sep-2005, expiring on 02-Sep-2005," JJK continued.

"And?" I waited.



"Now," instructed JJK, "scroll down further. Note the underlying registry data for this record. Here is what you will find":

IP Address: 198.65.50.185 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)

IP Location: US (UNITED STATES) - COLORADO-ENGLEWOOD

Y! Directory: See listings

Web Site Title: Welcome to the Bush-Clinton Katrina Fund Official Web Site

Data as of: 14-Jun-2005

I followed JJK's instructions. I found the information he wanted me to see.

Further research also revealed the fund was set up months in advance of Hurricane Katrina.

"This is premeditated mass murder, just like the Florida Hurricanes last year before the presidential election, to put people in a state of vertigo and mass confusion," states John Joseph Kennedy. "The man-ufactured tornados, tsunamis and hurricanes are the ultimate weapons of mass destruction."

The information JJK delivered to me is a gift from Mother Nature. She asked me to pass it on because she felt if enough people saw this article, they would realize the urgency of her call for help.

***

Carol Adler is President of Dandelion Books, LLC,
www.dandelionbooks.net,
info@dandelionbooks.net. John Joseph Kennedy can be reached at
lovefortheoceans@yahoo.com.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Thanks to Donna for sending this my way.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, August 14, 2005

Southern Ontario Cell Phone Tower Locator

Need help finding local death towers to bust? This guy has already done the leg work.

http://www.arcx.com/sites/

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, July 26, 2005

From my "Wish List"

http://geocities.com/orgonart/index.htm

First time I saw a photo of David's handmade chains it was glowing purple, a tribute to the amount of love and effort he puts into each chain he makes.



I also love the fact he makes them in custom lengths to adjust the HP exactly on your heart chakra.



Can't wait to get my hands on one of these!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home